W.Virginia’s “right to carry” subjects citizens behaving lawfully while armed to being frisked by a police officer – so says the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The fact that a person is lawfully entitled to carry a firearm does not eliminate the risk to a police officer who confronts such a situation. Review the entire opinion here – http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/144902A.P.pdf
Categories
- Battered Spouse Defense (1)
- Border Searches (1)
- Canine (K-9) Searches (1)
- Cell Phone Search Warrants (1)
- Commentary (2)
- CP (1)
- Duress Defense – Threatened Witness (1)
- Eyewitness Identification (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Homicide-Murder-Manslaughter (1)
- Rule Of Evidence (1)
- Rules Of Evidence (3)
- Search-Frisk (3)
- Uncategorized (9)
Archives
- July 2021 (1)
- January 2021 (2)
- October 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- October 2019 (2)
- January 2019 (1)
- November 2018 (1)
- April 2018 (4)
- January 2018 (1)
- November 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (3)
- May 2017 (1)
- January 2017 (2)
- August 2016 (2)
Recent Posts
- DRONE SURVEILLANCE – WHO’S WATCHING YOU
- RAP LYRICS – MARYLAND COA GIVES FINAL TURN TO KEY LOCKING IN 50 YEAR SENTENCE
- A LOOK AT CAR SEARCHES – ON A “THREE-DIMENSIONAL FOURTH AMENDMENT VOYAGE” WITH JUDGE MOYLAN IN STATE V. WHITE
- Border Searches of Cellphones and Electronic Devices – A Discussion by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals
- “Unfriending” On Facebook – An Act That is Ok To Prove Guilt As Accomplice To Attempted Robbery So Says The Maryland Court of Appeals In State v. Sample
Subscribe To This Blog's Feed
Over 40 years of trial experience as a federal and state prosecutor and as a criminal defense attorney