Cases, News & Articles

(Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. with his client outside of the United States District

Court in Greenbelt, Maryland after winning a mistrial in a four week

mail  fraud and obstruction of justice prosecution.)

*   *   *   *   *

EXPERIENCED IN ALL CRIMINAL MATTERS FROM MISDEMEANOR

CRIMINAL AND TRAFFIC OFFENSES TO VIOLENT CRIME AND

COMPLEX FINANCIAL CRIMES  IN  STATE AND FEDERAL COURT

     As the following case summaries and recognitions illustrate Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. is one of the most active criminal trial and appellate lawyers in the area.  Whether in the local trial courts handling a homicide, sexual assault, DUI or domestic assault case or in the federal court presenting a defense in a complex white collar or narcotics or before an appellate court, Maryland criminal lawyer Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. is at home in the federal and local trial and appellate courts in Maryland and the District of Columbia.

     This page reviews some of the more significant and interesting cases and activities of  Maryland criminal defense attorney Robert C. Bonsib, Esq.  These cases offer a glimpse of the breadth and type of criminal matters, educational programs, bar and court activities and other significant events and activities in which Mr. Bonsib has been involved. 

     In some these cases, Mr. Bonsib was successful in winning acquittals or the dismissal of charges for his clients.  While an outright acquittal or dismissal is the best of all possible results, in some cases the evidence may be such that the likelihood of success at trial is minimal and that it is in the best interest of a client to seek the most favorable sentence.  In many cases, success is measured by the degree to which a favorable disposition can be negotiated or by the extent to which a client's sentence was able to be minimized or modified.

     In addition to his active criminal defense practice, Mr. Bonsib frequency writes and lectures other Maryand criminal lawyers and law enforcement professionals on recent developments in the area of federal and state criminal law.  He is also often asked to serve on court and bar association committees and is regularly consulted by the local media on matters of public interest in the field of criminal law.

*   *   *   *  *

ROBERT C. BONSIB, ESQ. RECEIVES AWARD FOR CAREER AS CRIMINAL LAWYER (MAY, 2009)

*     *     *      *     *

DECEMBER 2009 - ROBERT C. BONSIB AGAIN RECOGNIZED BY WASHINGTONIAN MAGAZINE AS ONE OF THE TOP 30 LAWYERS IN THE WASHINGTON AREA

ROBERT C. BONSIB, ESQ. LISTED FOR THE THIRD CONSECUTIVE YEAR IN MARYLAND SUPERLAWYER'S AS ONE OF MARYLAND'S TOP 50 LAWYERS AND IN SUPERLAWYERS D.C. EDITION AS ONE OF THE TOP 100 LAWYERS IN DC (2008-9-10)

   In its December, 2009 edition, Washingtonian Magazine recognized Maryland criminal lawyer Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. for the fourth consecutive time as one of the regions top criminal lawyers (2002, 2004, 2007 & 2009).   From a list of what the Washingtonian Magazine characterized as the top 800 lawyers in the area, it narrowed the list to the 30 "best of the best."  Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. was included in this select group of Top 30 Lawyers in both 2007 and again in 2009. 

    Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. has also been repeated listed in SuperLawyers as one of the top lawyers in Maryland (twice listed in the top 50 Maryland lawyers) and as one of the top 100 lawyers in D.C.

*   *   *   *   *

DISMISSAL IN PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY RAPE PROSECUTION (JAN, 2010)

    After a series of pre-trial hearings, the Prince George's County prosecutor dismissal allegations of gang rape against Mr. Bonsib's client.  At the initial hearing, questions were raised about the manner in which a pre-trial identificaiton procedure was conducted.  Mr. Bonsib challenged the representation made by the detective who obtained an arrest warrant for Mr. Bonsib's client - an arrest warrant that lead to a statement being made by Mr. Bonsib's client. That statement was then challenged as improperly obtained as a result of allegedly false or recklessly inaccurate reprsentations made by the investigating detective to support the issuance of an arrest warrant for Mr. Bonsib's client.  Prior to the third pre-trial hearing, the proecution dismissed the case against Mr. Bonsib's client.

*   *   *   *   *

PROBATION IN BANK FRAUD PROSECUTION (JAN. 2010)

    Mr. Bonsib's client and his client's wife were indicted in the United States District Court in Baltimore, Maryland and alleged to have participated in a bank fraud that the government contended resulted in a 2.6 million dollar loss to an area bank.  After 2 days of trial, the government backed away from its allegations - allegations that it had relied upon to seek a multi-year sentence of incarceration of Mr. Bonsib's client.  After 2 days of vigorous cross-examination of the government's witnesses, the government offered Mr. Bonsib's client a plea to a single count alleging a $56,000 false statement, which Mr. Bonsib's client accepted.  At the sentecing hearing, Mr. Bonsib's client received probation. 

*   *   *   *   *

DISMISSAL IN ST. MARY'S COUNTY MARYLAND RAPE PROSECUTION

    Nearly a year after an alleged rape, Mr. Bonsib's client was charged with rape, based upon a DNA "hit."   After aggressively challenging the validity of the government's case, including an extensive cross-examination at the preliminary hearing - the prosecution elected not to indict Mr. Bonsib's client and to dismiss all charges against his client.

*   *   *   *   *

NEW TRIAL ORDERED IN CALVERT COUNTY RAPE CASE (SEPTEMBER, 2009)

   A D.C. firefigher, after having been convicted by a Calvert County jury of second degree rape, retained Mr. Bonsib to handle his motion for a new trial and, if necessary, to represent him on appeal.   After a lengthy two-hour hearing on Mr. Bonsib's motion for new trial, a Calvert County judge agreed with Mr. Bonsib's arguments that a number of errors had occurred during the original trial and concluded that it was in the interests of justice to grant Mr. Bonsib's client a new trial.   The new trial is pending.

*   *   *

SUCCESSFUL RE-SENTENCING HEARING IN FEDERAL TAX PREPARER PROSECUTION

After being retained to handle an appeal of a tax preparer conviction for tax fraud, Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. won a reversal of the sentencing decision by the trial.  His client had originally been sentenced to 78 months in jail.   After convincing the appellate court that the trial court erred in its methodology for determining tax loss, which the trial court and the government had originally calculated at over 4 million dollars, the appellate court ordered a new sentencing hearing.  At the re-sentencing hearing, the tax loss was reduced to approximately $550,000 and Mr. Bonsib's client received a reduced sentence of 48 months.

*   *   *   *   *

REDUCED SENTENCE IN FEDERAL LACEY ACT PROSECUTION

Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. represented a rockfish dealer and Southern Maryland waterman who had pled guilty in federal court to violations of the Federal Lacey Act, which includes federal fish and wildlaw laws.  While Mr. Bonsib's client admitted that he had participated in the falsification of certain records regarding rockfish, he contended that the government had grossly exaggerated the nature and extent of his conduct.   As a result, Mr. Bonsib and his client demanded  that issues relating to the nature of his conduct be resolved by the United States District Court at a contested sentencing hearing.  The government sought a sentence of 70 months in the Bureau of Prisons for Mr. Bonsib's client.   After a 3 day sentencing hearing, the District Court rejected the government's excessive sentencing recommendation and, instead, imposed a sentence of only 18 months.

*   *   *   *   *

SUCCESS IN ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING RE CHILD ABUSE REGISTRY

     A client of Robert C. Bonsib's was advised that the Department of Social Services proposed to list him on the Department's Child Abuse Registry.  Mr. Bonsib appealed the proposed action.  After a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Administrative Law Judge rejected the proposed action by the Department of Social Services to list the client as an "indicated child abuser" and directed that Department to remove from its records the client's name as as one who had been alleged to have committed child abuse and "ruled out" the Department's proposed finding.

*   *   *

JURY ACQUITS PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL VICE-PRINCIPAL AFTER 1 WEEK JURY TRIAL (Prince Georges Circuit Court) (2009)

  In April, 2009 after a one-week jury trial in the Prince George's County Circuit Court, Robert C. Bonsib's client was found not guilty of all charges. Mr. Bonsib's client, a vice-principal at a local elementary school was accused of having sexually abused a student at the school.   The jury, after a brief period of deliberations, returned a quick verdict of not guilty on all counts. 

*   *   *   *   *

POST-CONVICTION RELIEF GRANTED - NEW TRIAL ORDERED - PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

7 YEAR SENTENCE REDUCED TO TIME SERVED  (MAY 2009)

    A new trial was granted to Mr. Bonsib's client based upon a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief that was filed alleging that Mr. Bonsib's client received ineffective assistance of counsel.   The Circuit Court agreed with Mr. Bonsib's argument that his client was mislead regarding the sentence that he was to receive as a result of his guilty pleas to burglary and theft.   After a new trial was ordered, Mr. Bonsib was able to negotiate a time served disposition for his client.  His client who, prior to Mr. Bonsib taking over representation, had been sentenced to 7 years in the Maryland Department of Corrections and had served 1 year of that sentence, was given a time served sentence, thus ending the prosecution and reducing the client's sentence from 7 years to 1 year time served.

*   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN CALVERT COUNTY DISTRICT COURT PROSECUTION FOR VIOLATION OF SEX  OFFENDER REGISTRY (JUNE, 2009)

    After a half-day trial in the Calvert County District Court, Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. won an acquittal for his client, an person required to register under the sex offender registry statute, on both charges which alleged that he violated the restrictions imposed on one who is required to register pursuant to the Maryland Sexual Offender Registry statute.

*   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN STALKING, HARASSMENT, IMPERSONATION AND ASSAULT PROSECUTION - (Montgomery County District Court)  (2009)

  In April, 2009 Robert C. Bonsib represented a young man accused of assaulting a woman after she left a Gaithersburg bar after impersonating a police officer.  He was also charged with stalking her with respect to an incident alleged to have occured two days after the initial incident.  After a day-long trial in the Montgomery County District Court, Mr. Bonsib's client was found not guilty of each of the charges of stalking, harassment, impersonating a police officer and assault.

*   *   *   *   *

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS REMANDS FOR RE-SENTENCING IN TAX FRAUD CASE (May, 2009)

   Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. won a re-sentencing hearing in a tax fraud matter which Mr. Bonsib handled on appeal.  The Court of Appeals agreed with Mr. Bonsib's argument that the United States District Court erred in determining that his client was responsible for more than a 4 million dollar tax loss to the government.  The re-sentencing hearing is pending.

 *   *   *   *   *

1 YEAR HOUSE ARREST IN VEHICULAR HOMICIDE CASE (Prince George's County Circuit Court) (May 2009)

   Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. was able to successfull negotiate a  sentence of 1 year house arrest for his client who was accused of being intoxicated when his vehicle collided with another vehicle resulting in the death of one individual and injuries to another.   Mr. Bonsib's client pled guilty to homicide by motor vehicle while intoxicated, but will not have to serve any time in jail.  This case is an example of the importance of careful evaluation of the evidence in each case.  In certain prosecutions, where the evidence is strong, the most important role for a criminal defense attorney is to seek as lenient and fair a sentence as possible for an accused person.

*   *   *   *   *

MISDEMEANOR PLEA IN FEDERAL IMMIGRATION/HARBORING PROSECUTION

     Mr. Bonsib's client had been indicted for harboring an alien and for related federal felony immigration violations.  Initially faced with the government demanding at least 24 months of imprisonment, Mr. Bonsib was ultimately able to negotiate a misdemeanor plea and a sentence of probation that limited the client's punishment to a period of probation and 90 days of house arrest with work release.

*   *   *   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT AFTER 3 1/2 WEEK TRIAL IN 5.5 MILLION THEFT AND SECURITIES TRIAL (Mongtomery County Circuit Court) (2008)

   In September, 2008 after a three and a half week trial in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, Robert C. Bonsib's client was found not guilty of all nine counts against him.  Mr. Bonsib's client had been accused of participating with others in a securities fraud and theft scheme in which investors were told that they were investigating in a salvageable goods business that, in fact, was non-existent.  Investors ultimately lost approximately 5.5 million dollars.   Mr. Bonsib's client was charged with theft, conspiracy, securities fraud and identity theft.   Mr. Bonsib presented evidence and successfully argued that his client, like many others, was a victim of the scheme and not a co-conspirator in the charged fraudulent scheme.  

*   *    *   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT - 1ST DEGREE ASSAULT  (Calver County Circuit Court) (2009)

    In January, 2009, in the Calvert County Circuit Court, Robert C. Bonsib's client was acquitted of 1st degree assault and theft.  Mr. Bonsib's client had been accused of theft from a Calvert County retail business and of driving her vehicle at a store employee as she sought to leave the parking lot of the business.

*   *   *   *   *

FELLOW, AMERICAN COLLEGE OF TRIAL LAWYERS

    Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. has been a Fellow in the American College of Trial Lawyers for almost a decade. The American College of Trial Lawyers is a prestigious national organization of trial lawyers whose membership is limited to the top 1% of the nation's trial lawyers. Fellowship in the College is extended by invitation only, after careful investigation, to those experienced trial lawyers who have master the art of advocacy and whose professional careers have been marked by the highest standards of ethical conduct and professionalism.

*   *   *   *   *

DISMISSAL OF ATTEMPTED RAPE / SEXUAL OFFENSE INDICTMENT (Montgomery County Circuit Court)

   In October, 2008 Mr. Bonsib's client obtained a dismissal of an indictment in which Mr. Bonsib's client had been indicted for attempted rape and for a third degree sexual offense.  Earlier in the proceedings, Mr. Bonsib was successful in convincing the Court that his client's video taped statement to investigators was unlawfully obtained and was the product of unlawful promises and inducements.   The Court agreed and ruled that the statement would not be able to be used by the prosecution during the trial.   The statement would have been a critical piece of evidence for the prosecution.  Shortly before the scheduled October jury trial, the prosecution notifed Mr. Bonsib that it would be dismissing the indictment against his client.

*   *    *   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN MISDEMEANOR DRUG CASE  (Howard County District Court) (2008)

   As noted above, Mr.  Bonsib has successfully defended complex financial crime cases, but he is equally comfortable with and active in representing individuals who find themselves charged with misdemeanor criminal offenses and traffic offenses in the District Courts of Maryland and the federal Magistrate's courts.    As an example, in September, 2008 Mr. Bonsib represented a woman charged in the Howard County District Court with possessing marihuana in her home.  The marihuana was seized during the execution of a search at the woman's home.  A number of other individuals were also present in the home at the time of the execution of the search warrant.   Mr. Bonsib successfully argued that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the marihuana that was found at the residence was in the actual or constructive possession of his client and she was found not guilty.

*   *    *    *    *  

40 MINUTE NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN RAPE CASE  (Prince George's County Circuit Court) (2008)

    In February, 2008 after a 3 day jury trial in Prince George's County and after only 40 minutes of deliberation, Robert C. Bonsib won not guilty verdicts for his client who was charged with second degree rape and second degree assault.   The prosecution alleged that a woman was sexually assaulted while unconscious after an evening of drinking.  Mr. Bonsib's client flatly denied the woman's allegations.  The jury concluded that the the prosecution's allegations were not proven.

*   *   *   *   *

GOVERNMENT FAILS  -  MISTRIAL IN HIGH PROFILE PUBLIC CORRPUTION PROSECUTION (United States District Court - District of Maryland) (2007)

     In the fall of 2007, the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland described its prosecution of the former chief executive officer fo the Prince George's County Public Schools as one of its most important prosecutions.   Despite offering video taped evidence allegedly showing Mr. Bonsib's client engaged in criminal conduct, Mr. Bonsib was successful in derailing the government's prosecution.   Despite four weeks of government evidence, the jury was not able to reach a unanimous verdict on any of the 16 counts which charged mail and wire fraud and obstruction of justice.  A mistrial was declared after 7 days of deliberations and over 55 hours of deliberations.   For a description of the trial and the significance of the mistrial in this case, see the WUSA report on the mistrial   (Click here to see story and video WUSA report of mistrial ) and the NBC 4 report on the mistrial (Click here to see NBC 4 report of mistrial).

*    *    *    *    *

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY DISTRICT COURT NOT GUILTY VERDICTS

    While Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. handles complex matters in the federal and state courts, he also regularly appears in the Maryland District Court and United States Magistrate Courts handling misdemeanor cases such as DUI, theft, drug possession, domestic violence and weapons violations.  In April, 2008 Mr. Bonsib was successful in two District Court trials in winning acquittals for his clients.  In one matter, a client was charged with stealing merchandise from a local retail business.  In the other matter, a client, a college student, was accused of disorderly conduct and failing to obey the orders of a police officer after the client left a college town bar at closing time and became involved in a verbal altercation with a police officer.

*   *   *   *   *

DISMISSAL IN FEDERAL IMMIGRATION FRAUD PROSECUTION (United States District Court - District of Maryland)

     In March, 2008 Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. was successful in convincing local prosecutors to dismiss all charges against his client, who had been indicted last year in a multi-defendant case, for engaging in what the government contented was an conspiracy to defraud the immigration authorities by submitting fraudulent labor cert applications that, if approved, would permit non-U.S. citizens to enter and work in the United States.   After a number of meetings with the govenrment, Mr. Bonsib was able to convince the government, shortly before the scheduled trial date, that the indictment against his client should be dismissed.

*   *   *   *   *

DISMISSAL IN FEDERAL TAX PROSECUTION (United States District Court - District of Maryland)

   In the Spring of 2008, the United States Attorney's Office dismissed all charges against Mr. Bonsib's client who had been indicted for federal income tax violations.  Throughout the course of the investigation and prosecution of this matter, Mr. Bonsib aggressively asserted the position of innocence maintained by his client and made it clear to the government that his client would fight the allegations, through trial if necessary.  While others in the case pled guilty, the indictment against Mr. Bonsib's client was dismissed shortly before the scheduled trial date.

 *   *   *   *   *    

ROBERT BONSIB RECOGNIZED AS ONE OF "THE BEST LAWYERS IN AMERICA" 

(2005-2009)

     Based upon the nomination of his colleagues, Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. has been selected to be included in the 2009 Edition of "The Best Lawyers in America" as one of the best criminal lawyers in the areas of both white collar and non-white collar criminal defense.   This is the fourth consecutive year in which Mr. Bonsib has been so recognized.

NOT GUILTY VERDICT AFTER 3 MONTH FEDERAL CONSPIRACY,

MAIL FRAUD & FALSE STATEMENT TRIAL

(United States Distirct Court - District of Columbia)

(Photo from Metro edition of Washington Post of Mr. Bonsib and his client leaving federal court in Washington, D.C. after his client's acquittal)

     After a three-month trial in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Mr. Bonsib's client was acquitted of all charges.  Mr Bonsib's client had been indicted for conspiracy, mail fraud and a series of false statement charges arising out of a prosecution of a number of officials of the Washington Teachers' Union for the embezzlement of approximately 5 million dollars of union members' funds.

     This highly publicized federal white collar prosecution resulted in the conviction, in the same trial, of two union officials.  Others pled guilty before the trial.  Mr. Bonsib's client, an accountant and tax preparer, who was accused of preparing false financial statements, was the only defendant not convicted in this series of prosecutions.

*    *    *    *    *

WASHINGTONIAN MAGAZINE NAMES ROBERT C. BONSIB, ESQ. AS A "TOP CRIMINAL LAWYER"  [2002, 2004, 2007]

     Washingtonian Magazine, for the third time, acknowledged Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. as one of the area's top criminal lawyers,  In its most recent issue recognizing the top area lawyers, Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. was listed in its  "Top 30 Lawyers" category.  Washingtonian Magazine has observed that if you or a relative is under arrest that Robert C. Bonsib is one of the top "lawyers who know the criminal law and their way around area courtrooms."  It further noted that selection for its list of top lawyers was made only after it contacted "hundreds of attorneys" in the field of criminal law and "asked which lawyer in their field-other than themselves-they would trust with their business.  Lawyers with the most recommendations made the [Washingtonian's] list."

     Robert C. Bonsib was first honored by the Washingtonian Magazine in 2002 when it recognzied him as one of the area's top 75 lawyers.

*   *   *   *   *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN RAPE PROSECUTION (Prince George's County Circuit Court) (2007)

     In September, 2007 a Prince George's County jury returned a not guilty verdict after 80 minutes of deliberation in a case where Mr. Bonsib's client, a former municipal police officer, had been charged with misconduct in office and with second degree rape based upon an allegation that he raped a woman with whom he had contact while on-duty.   The misconduct in office charged was dismissed by the trial court in the middle of the trial and the jury returned a not guily verdict at the conclusion of the entire case. 

*    *    *    *    *

DISMISSAL IN CHILD ABUSE PROSECUTION - (Prince George's County Circuit Court) (2007)

   In September, 2007 in the Prince George's County Circuit Court the prosecution was forced to dismiss a child abuse indictment filed against Mr. Bonsib's client when the Court denied the prosecution's request for a further postponement of the trial date.  Mr. Bonsib's client had been accused of improper sexual contact with his neice.  Mr. Bonsib had prepared an alibi defense based upon witness testimony and through the reconstruction of his client's activities on the evening of the alleged incident.  The reconstruction, through a time line supported by telephone records, payroll records, credit card and other receipts conclusively demonstrated that his client was at least 15 miles away from the scene of the alleged event on the date and at the time that his client was accused of committing the crime. 

*    *    *    *    *

ROBERT C. BONSIB, ESQ. RECOGNIZED IN "WHO'S WHO IN AMERICAN LAW"

     Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. has been repeated recognized in "Who's Who In American Law."

*    *    *    *    *

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT PROSECUTION

     In August, 2007 a Prince George's County jury returned a not guilty verdict after just 45 minutes of deliberation in a case where Robert C. Bonsib's client had been charged with leaving a firearm and ammunition in a location where a minor child could readily obtain the firearm and ammunition.  The minor child was fatally wounded when the firearm discharged.  Mr. Bonsib's argued successfully to the jury that the death was an accident and that his client had done all that was reasonably appropriate under the circumstances to keep the firearm out of the hands of the minor.

*   *    *    *   *

SUCCESSFUL SENTENCING IN FEDERAL COCAINE CONSPIRACY CASE - (United States District Court for the District of Maryland)

      In many cases, success is measured by the nature of the punishment received by the client.  In cases where the evidence is compelling, the responsibility of a criminal defense attorney is to seek the most favorable sentence for an accused.

     In June, 2007 Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. convinced the United States District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland to impose a sentence of 12 months home detention in a cocaine conspiracy case where the government had argued for a 10 year sentence.  Mr. Bonsib' s client had pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocaine and unlawful posssession of ammunition by a convicted felon.

     At a lengthy sentencing hearing, Mr. Bonsib initially convinced the trial court that his client was eligible for treatment under the "safety valve" provisions of the federal sentencing laws and federal sentencing Guidelines and that his client should not receive an upward adjustment of his Guidelines as a result of the presence of three handguns in his residence.  The ruling that Mr. Bonsib's client was eligible for the "safety valve"  meant that the court was not bound by the 10 year mandatory sentence and that his client's Guidelines sentencing range was reduced to 78-97 months.

     In the second phase of the sentencing hearing, through the use of video presentations illustrating the compelling need of the client's disabled daughter for his presence and through the use of many testimonials, both in written and oral form, Mr. Bonsib then convinced the trial court to depart downward from the Guidelines range of 78-97 months to a sentence of 12 months of house arrest.

NOT GUILTY VERDICT IN D.C. VEHICULAR MANSLAUGHTER PROSECUTION

     After a week-long trial in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, Mr. Bonsib was succesful in convincing a Superior Court jury to return verdicts of not guilty as to the charges of vehicular manslaughter and negligent homicide.  Mr. Bonsib's client was charged with fatally striking a pedestrian who was walking across the street in the middle of the block in the evening hours.   The government alleged that Mr. Bonsib's client was speeding and under the influence of alcohol.  Mr. Bonsib persuaded the jury that any evidence of speed and any evidence relating to the consumption of alcohol did not substantially contribute to the causing of the accident and, further argued that it was the conduct of the pedestrian that caused the fatal accident.

ROBERT C. BONSIB, ESQ. INSTRUCTS  MARYLAND JUDGES REGARDING THE CRIMINAL TRIAL

     Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. was again asked to particpate as an instructor at the Judicial Institute of Maryland.  Together with two Circuit Court judges, he conducted a day-long training program - "The Conduct of a Criminal Trial" - for Maryland Circuit and District Court judges.   This is the second time that Mr. Bonsib has been invited to present the day-long seminar to Maryland judges.

ROBERT C. BONSIB INVITED TO ATTEND JUDICIAL CONFERENCE FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS

     Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. has been invited by the United States District Court in Greenbelt, Maryland to attend, as a lawyer member, the annual judicial conference held by the Judicial Conference of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.   This year's conference with be held at the Wintergreen Resort.   The featured speaker is Chief Justice John Roberts of the United States Supreme Court.

HUNG JURY IN EXCESSIVE FORCE PROSECUTION

      In June, 2007 after a week-long trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George's County, the prosecution was unsuccesful in attempting to persuade a jury that Mr. Bonsib's client, a police officer with an area municipal police department, used excessive force during the detention of an individual.  After two days of deliberations a mistrial was declared when the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict.

DISMISSAL IN CHARLES COUNTY FEDERAL ARSON CASE

      In December, 2004 over 40 homes were burned in Charles County, Maryland in the largest case of arson in Maryland's history.  Six individuals were charged with arson after an extensive federal and state investigation.  Mr. Bonsib represented one of the six defendants.  After an expedited and careful investigation, Mr. Bonsib and his investigator were able to reconstruct the activities of his client during the even before and on the morning of the arsons and convince federal prosecutors that his client was not involved in the arsons, despite his having been implicated in the arsons by two of the other individuals charged in the case.  Each of the other five defendants either pled guilty or were convicted after trial.  by using cellular telephone tower records and other records and receipts, Mr. Bonsib was able to track the location of his client during the evening of the arsons and demonstrate that his client was in Rockvlle and at other locations in Maryland at the time when others involved in the arsons were allegedly setting over fourty homes on fire.   Mr. Bonsib's client was the only one of the original six defendants who was not convicted and sentenced to imprisonment. 

DISMISSAL IN DNA "COLD HIT" RAPE PROSECUTION

     In January, 2007 Mr. Bonsib successfully convicted a judge in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County to deny the prosecution's request for a postponement in a 1992 rape case.   Mr. Bonsib's client was identified, according to the prosecution, by comparison of his DNA taken while he was incarcerated on an unrelated matter to DNA in an data base that contained the DNA obtained during the investigaiton of the 1992 incident.   Through the filing of various pre-trial motions, Mr. Bonsib won a ruling from the trial judge that the prosecution failed to properly and timely provide to the defense the materials and information regarding the DNA testing and results and that, therefore, the prosecution would not be permitted to use the DNA results unless the trial date was continued to a later date.  Only by a delay of the trial would the defense have been afforded an adequate opportunity to analyze the DNA testing process.  Because the case had been pending for a lengthy period of time and because of the adverse employment and other consequences suffered by his client during that period, Mr. Bonsib was then able to convince the court that the prosecution's request for a further delay in the case was not supported by good cause.  When the postponement request was denied, it also had the result of preventing the prosecution from using the DNA evidence.  When those two events occurred, the prosecution had insufficient evidence to proceed to trial and had to dismiss the indictment. 

HOME DETENTION IN AUTOMOBILE MANSLAUGHTER CASE

     In May, 2007 Mr. Bonsib secured a sentence of home detention for his client who had pled guilty to automobile manslaughter.  Mr. Bonsib's client had been indicted for manslaughter by automobile and driving under the influence of alcohol.  His client was accused of operating a motor vehicle at a high rate of speed, failing to negotiate a curve and running off the road, striking a tree with the result that one passenger in his vehicle died and the other was seriously injured and  remained in the hospital for a number of weeks.  Mr. Bonsib's client had a blood alcohol level of .16. 

     In addition to convincing the trial court to permit Mr. Bonsib's client to serve his sentence on home detention, Mr. Bonsib was also successful at hearing before the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration in convincing an administrative law judge to reject a recommendation by the Medical Advisory Board that his client's driving privileges should be suspended.   Mr. Bonsib's client was permitted to retain his driving privileges.

REVERSAL OF ATTORNEY'S OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CONVICTION

     Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. successfully argued before the Maryland Court of Appeals that the conviction of a local prominent criminal defense attorney for obstruction of justice should be reversed because of a denial of the attorney's constitutional right to a speedy trial.  In May, 2007 the Court of Special Appeals issued an opinion agreeing that the attorney's speedy trial rights had been violated and directed that the conviction be reversed.

PROBATIONARY SENTENCE IN FEDERAL FIREARMS CASE

     In May, 2007, at a sentencing hearing in a case where his client had pled guilty to unlawful possession of a sawed-off shotgun, Mr. Bonsib convinced a federal judge to impose a below Guidelines sentence.  Mr. Bonsib's client. formerly a police officer with an area police department, had faced a recommended sentence of 3 years under the federal sentencing Guidelines.  Because of the unusual circumstances surrounding his client's involvement in this offense, Mr. Bonsib persuaded the federal judge to grant his client a downward departure from the Guidelines range for "aberrant conduct" and to grant his client a probationary sentence. 

$127,000 DEFAMATION VERDICT AFFIRMED BY MARYLAND COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS

      Although Robert C. Bonsib, Esq. handles primarily criminal matters, on this occasion Mr. Bonsib handled a defamation matter for a client who had been wrongfully accused of being convicted of theft while a teenager.  As a result of the allegation, his employer fired him.  After Mr. Bonsib successfully convinced a Montgomery County, Maryland to award his client $127,000 for lost wages and mental anguish, he then persuaded the Maryland Court of Special Appeals to affirm the judgment in a reported opinion.  See Montgomery Investigative Services, Ltd. v. Horne , 173 Md. 193, 918 A.2d 526 (2007).